tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16398571.post115741619678814107..comments2023-10-30T11:57:26.749+01:00Comments on SCREENVILLE: Critical Fallacy 2 : ManipulationUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16398571.post-70603569909604886202011-03-28T16:07:06.065+02:002011-03-28T16:07:06.065+02:00Ad Hominem in Critical Debate (Adrian Martin)<a href="http://screenville.blogspot.com/2011/03/ad-hominem-in-critical-debate-adrian.html" rel="nofollow">Ad Hominem in Critical Debate (Adrian Martin)</a>HarryTuttlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10721542203087536185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16398571.post-31167415630824774112007-05-18T20:05:00.000+02:002007-05-18T20:05:00.000+02:00Hi Hugo Alexandre,yes, what i'm dealing with here ...Hi Hugo Alexandre,<BR/><BR/>yes, what i'm dealing with here is only the weak side of criticism, bad reviewing, and one wrong at the time. So my articles don't define the state of criticism each time, only an aspect of it. But we can find these issues even in the best critics. It's not limited to mindless synopsis...<BR/><BR/>Maybe the readers can form their own opinion, but since the writer saw HarryTuttlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10721542203087536185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16398571.post-50159523324288164972007-05-15T01:15:00.000+02:002007-05-15T01:15:00.000+02:00I think I am beginning to understand what you are ...I think I am beginning to understand what you are trying to do. You are deconstructing traditional film reviews as they have been presented to us through press channels. The typical film review, the one which is meant to lightly suggest a sense of what the film is about without giving too much away. The one you read on Friday to plan your weekend outings. <BR/><BR/>(The critic's job isn't to Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16398571.post-51226000508649398582007-02-25T17:15:00.000+01:002007-02-25T17:15:00.000+01:00At Scanners, Jim Emerson quotes excerpts from Rena...At Scanners, Jim Emerson quotes excerpts from Renata Adler's jab at Pauline Kael's reviews collection "When the Lights Go Down" in the post : <A HREF="http://blogs.suntimes.com/scanners/2007/02/pauline_and_renata_go_showboat.html" REL="nofollow">Pauline and Renata Go Showboating</A> (1980)<BR/><BR/>"To the spectacle of the staff critic as celebrity in frenzy, about to "do" something "to" a text, HarryTuttlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10721542203087536185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16398571.post-1162743903088738872006-11-05T17:25:00.000+01:002006-11-05T17:25:00.000+01:00via Girish, Adrian Martin on a_film_by :"Although ...via <A HREF="http://www.girishshambu.com/blog/2006/10/archiveology-five-hungry-men.html#c116265589657100525" REL="nofollow">Girish</A>, Adrian Martin on <A HREF="http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/a_film_by/messages/26021?threaded=1&m=e&var=1&tidx=1" REL="nofollow">a_film_by</A> :<BR/>"Although I myself recycled the word in a recent post, I think we sensible folks at AFB should call a HarryTuttlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10721542203087536185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16398571.post-1158830442319460972006-09-21T11:20:00.000+02:002006-09-21T11:20:00.000+02:00Jim Emerson : "(...) But I'm not sure his treatmen...Jim Emerson : "(...) But I'm not sure his treatment, or imaginative possession (sexual and otherwise), of his not-at-all-obscure objects of desire is any less tabloid-creepy because it is presented as critical nonfiction rather than as gossip or on some fanatical fan blog, except that Thomson's writing is better. (...)<BR/>So, if Thomson is going to write about movie-fed fantasies, and he's HarryTuttlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10721542203087536185noreply@blogger.com